Triple
T20024004
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board |
E494929
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank | Statement: [College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, relatedCase, Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank Context triple: [College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board, relatedCase, Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board v. College Savings Bank]
-
A.
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board
chosen
College Savings Bank v. Florida Prepaid Postsecondary Education Expense Board is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited Congress’s ability to abrogate state sovereign immunity under the Commerce Clause, holding that states cannot be sued for false advertising under federal law without their consent.
-
B.
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors
Northeast Bancorp, Inc. v. Board of Governors is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed whether regional interstate banking compacts among states violated the Constitution’s Compact Clause and related federal banking laws.
-
C.
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe
Santa Fe Independent School District v. Doe is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held student-led, student-initiated prayer at public school football games unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
-
D.
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court case that held the CFPB’s leadership structure unconstitutional because its single director was insulated from presidential removal, reshaping limits on independent agencies.
-
E.
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents
Kimel v. Florida Board of Regents is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court case that held Congress lacked authority under the Fourteenth Amendment to subject nonconsenting states to private suits for money damages under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6628a1ecc8190bf6ee0bedb61e0b8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.