Triple

T20023747
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act E494923 entity
Predicate namedAfter P63 FINISHED
Object Westfall v. Erwin NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Westfall v. Erwin | Statement: [Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act, namedAfter, Westfall v. Erwin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Westfall v. Erwin
Context triple: [Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act, namedAfter, Westfall v. Erwin]
  • A. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • B. Romer v. Evans
    Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • C. Edwards v. Balisok
    Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
  • D. Hensley v. Eckerhart
    Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
  • E. Corfield v. Coryell
    Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Westfall v. Erwin
Target entity description: Westfall v. Erwin is a 1988 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited federal employees’ immunity from state-law tort suits, prompting Congress to enact statutory protections such as the Federal Employees Liability Reform and Tort Compensation Act.
  • A. Lucas v. Earl
    Lucas v. Earl is a landmark 1930 U.S. Supreme Court tax law case that established the principle that income is taxed to the person who earns it, regardless of contractual arrangements to split or assign that income.
  • B. Romer v. Evans
    Romer v. Evans is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down a Colorado constitutional amendment targeting gay, lesbian, and bisexual people as a violation of the Equal Protection Clause.
  • C. Edwards v. Balisok
    Edwards v. Balisok is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court decision that applied the Heck v. Humphrey doctrine to prison disciplinary proceedings, limiting when inmates can seek damages under §1983 if success would imply the invalidity of disciplinary sanctions affecting the length of confinement.
  • D. Hensley v. Eckerhart
    Hensley v. Eckerhart is a landmark 1983 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the modern standard for determining reasonable attorney’s fee awards for prevailing parties in civil rights litigation.
  • E. Corfield v. Coryell
    Corfield v. Coryell is an 1823 federal circuit court decision by Justice Bushrod Washington that famously articulated an influential early list of the fundamental rights protected by the U.S. Constitution’s Privileges and Immunities Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6628a1ecc8190bf6ee0bedb61e0b8 completed April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.