Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe | Statement: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe]

Target entity: Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Context triple: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe]

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
  Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
• C. Ex parte Crow Dog
  Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.
• D. Osage Nation Courts
  Osage Nation Courts are the judicial branch of the Osage Nation, responsible for interpreting and applying tribal law and administering justice within the Osage reservation.
• E. Navajo Nation court decisions
  Navajo Nation court decisions are judicial rulings that apply and develop Navajo law, including traditional Navajo common law principles, within the Navajo Nation’s legal system.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe
Target entity description: Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe is a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed the inherent authority of Native American tribes to impose taxes on non-Indian entities conducting business on tribal lands.

• A. Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States
  Tee-Hit-Ton Indians v. United States is a 1955 U.S. Supreme Court case that denied compensable property rights to an Alaska Native group by relying on the Doctrine of Discovery to limit Indigenous land claims.
• B. Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc.
  Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court case that held federal law preempts Arizona’s requirement that prospective voters provide documentary proof of citizenship when registering using the federal form.
• C. Ex parte Crow Dog
  Ex parte Crow Dog is an 1883 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed tribal sovereignty by holding that federal courts lacked jurisdiction over crimes committed by one Native American against another on tribal land.
• D. Osage Nation Courts
  Osage Nation Courts are the judicial branch of the Osage Nation, responsible for interpreting and applying tribal law and administering justice within the Osage reservation.
• E. Navajo Nation court decisions
  Navajo Nation court decisions are judicial rulings that apply and develop Navajo law, including traditional Navajo common law principles, within the Navajo Nation’s legal system.
• F. None of above. chosen