Triple

T20023408
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Indian Commerce Clause E494916 entity
Predicate citedInCase P4420 FINISHED
Object United States v. Kagama — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: United States v. Kagama | Statement: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, United States v. Kagama]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: United States v. Kagama
Context triple: [Indian Commerce Clause, citedInCase, United States v. Kagama]
  • A. United States v. Kagama chosen
    United States v. Kagama is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal authority over crimes committed by Native Americans on reservations, reinforcing congressional power in Indian affairs.
  • B. United States v. Wong Kim Ark
    United States v. Wong Kim Ark is an 1898 U.S. Supreme Court decision that firmly established birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment for nearly all individuals born on American soil.
  • C. Yasui v. United States
    Yasui v. United States was a 1943 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the wartime conviction of Minoru Yasui for violating a military-imposed curfew on Japanese Americans, thereby affirming the government’s authority to restrict their civil liberties during World War II.
  • D. Hawaii v. Mankichi
    Hawaii v. Mankichi is a 1903 U.S. Supreme Court decision addressing the application of constitutional criminal procedure protections in newly annexed U.S. territories, particularly regarding jury trial and grand jury requirements in Hawaii.
  • E. Missouri v. Holland
    Missouri v. Holland is a landmark 1920 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld the federal government’s power to implement international treaties through national legislation even in areas traditionally regulated by the states.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6628a1ecc8190bf6ee0bedb61e0b8 completed April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.