Triple
T2002291
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ALAC |
E43496
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAdvisoryStatus |
P12717
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Non-binding advice to ICANN Board |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Non-binding advice to ICANN Board | Statement: [ALAC, hasAdvisoryStatus, Non-binding advice to ICANN Board]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAdvisoryStatus Context triple: [ALAC, hasAdvisoryStatus, Non-binding advice to ICANN Board]
-
A.
hasAdvisoryJurisdictionUnder
Indicates that an authority or body holds the legal power to issue non-binding opinions or recommendations under a specified law, treaty, or framework.
-
B.
hasActivityStatus
Indicates the current state or condition of an activity, such as whether it is planned, ongoing, completed, or cancelled.
-
C.
hasAuthorityStatus
Indicates that one entity holds a particular level or type of official power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity or within a defined context.
-
D.
advisoryProcess
Indicates a relationship where one party provides guidance, recommendations, or expert advice to another through a structured consultative process.
-
E.
hasStatusLabel
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with a specific status expressed as a human-readable label.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb8820cec8190a945e5daeb8c9df6 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb79e63c08190982c8b44a557266f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.