Triple
T20021804
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Brazoria County, Texas |
E494878
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasTown |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Danbury, Texas |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Danbury, Texas | Statement: [Brazoria County, Texas, hasTown, Danbury, Texas]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Danbury, Texas Context triple: [Brazoria County, Texas, hasTown, Danbury, Texas]
-
A.
Danbury, Texas
chosen
Danbury, Texas is a small rural city in Brazoria County known for its close-knit community and location within the Greater Houston metropolitan area.
-
B.
Brownsboro, Texas
Brownsboro, Texas is a small rural city in East Texas known for its close-knit community and location within the Tyler metropolitan area.
-
C.
Dunlap, Texas
Dunlap, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Cottle County in the U.S. state of Texas.
-
D.
Briscoe, Texas
Briscoe, Texas is a small unincorporated rural community located in Wheeler County in the Texas Panhandle.
-
E.
Decatur, Texas
Decatur, Texas is a small North Texas city known as a regional hub for agriculture, ranching, and oil and gas activity northwest of the Dallas–Fort Worth metroplex.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e66288fc18819083833b55c5e069a6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:35 p.m.