Triple
T20021063
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Musqueam Indian Band |
E494856
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasLandRightsDisputes |
P118181
|
FINISHED |
| Object | land claims in Vancouver area |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: land claims in Vancouver area | Statement: [Musqueam Indian Band, hasLandRightsDisputes, land claims in Vancouver area]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLandRightsDisputes Context triple: [Musqueam Indian Band, hasLandRightsDisputes, land claims in Vancouver area]
-
A.
associatedTerritoryDispute
Indicates that there is a territorial dispute or contested claim connected to the referenced entity or relationship.
-
B.
hasIndigenousRightsClaims
chosen
Indicates that an entity asserts or is recognized as having legal or customary rights claims based on its status as an Indigenous people or community.
-
C.
conflictWithIndigenousPeoples
Indicates that an entity is involved in a dispute, clash, or antagonistic relationship with Indigenous peoples.
-
D.
locatedInDisputedTerritory
Indicates that an entity is situated within a geographic area whose sovereignty or ownership is contested between two or more parties.
-
E.
appliesToTerritorialDisputes
Indicates that a rule, agreement, or condition is relevant to or governs situations involving territorial disputes between parties.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6623fe1988190a1c09d392d866dc8 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54ce752748190a0a1ffddd0372271 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:34 p.m.