Triple
T20018554
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Atlanterhavsveien |
E494785
|
entity |
| Predicate | partOf |
P40
|
FINISHED |
| Object | County Road 64 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: County Road 64 | Statement: [Atlanterhavsveien, partOf, County Road 64]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: County Road 64 Context triple: [Atlanterhavsveien, partOf, County Road 64]
-
A.
County Road 64
chosen
County Road 64 is a Norwegian roadway known for its scenic coastal and island route, including connections to and across Averøya.
-
B.
County Road 86
County Road 86 is a scenic roadway in Norway that forms part of the National Tourist Route Senja, offering dramatic coastal and mountain landscapes on the island of Senja.
-
C.
County Road 361
County Road 361 is a local roadway in Taylor County, Florida, that serves as the primary route connecting inland areas to the coastal community of Keaton Beach.
-
D.
County Road 48
County Road 48 is a local roadway that serves as a key transportation route in the North Fork area.
-
E.
County Road 33
County Road 33 is a regional roadway in Ontario that serves as a key access route to and through Wellington and surrounding communities.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626bfd288190aa5d65098b6433ae |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6623e40748190b1abb0ead9acab4e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:34 p.m.