Triple
T20010763
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | In eminenti apostolatus specula |
E494581
|
entity |
| Predicate | citesAuthority |
P4420
|
FINISHED |
| Object | apostolic authority of the Roman Pontiff |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: apostolic authority of the Roman Pontiff | Statement: [In eminenti apostolatus specula, citesAuthority, apostolic authority of the Roman Pontiff]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: citesAuthority Context triple: [In eminenti apostolatus specula, citesAuthority, apostolic authority of the Roman Pontiff]
-
A.
legalCitationSystem
Indicates a system or convention used to reference and identify legal authorities such as cases, statutes, or regulations.
-
B.
legalCitation
chosen
Indicates that one legal document, case, or authority formally references or cites another as a source of legal support or precedent.
-
C.
constitutionalCitation
Indicates a relationship where one entity cites, references, or is grounded in a specific provision or article of a constitution.
-
D.
citesBody
Indicates that one entity references or cites the content, findings, or text of another entity as a source.
-
E.
consultedAuthorityForJudges
Indicates that an authority was consulted to provide guidance, information, or decisions for judges in a given context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626b2d748190886981ea90c8b2ea |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e662362df48190abf16129eea39985 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cdddbd48190becc8b2aa5ab4ef9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:33 p.m.