Triple
T2000728
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cutter v. Wilkinson |
E43462
|
entity |
| Predicate | concernsGroup |
P11116
|
FINISHED |
| Object | institutionalized persons |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: institutionalized persons | Statement: [Cutter v. Wilkinson, concernsGroup, institutionalized persons]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concernsGroup Context triple: [Cutter v. Wilkinson, concernsGroup, institutionalized persons]
-
A.
concernsRight
Indicates that something is about or relates specifically to a legal or moral right held by an entity.
-
B.
concernsLayer
Indicates that something is related or pertains specifically to a particular layer within a layered structure or system.
-
C.
concern
chosen
Indicates that one entity is about, relates to, or is of interest or importance to another entity.
-
D.
raisedConcernAbout
Indicates that one entity has expressed worry, doubt, or objection regarding another entity or issue.
-
E.
coveredGroup
Indicates that one group or set is included within, or has its members protected or accounted for by, another group or arrangement.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb87f78f0819098e787a5f3e062fd |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:32 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb79e63c08190982c8b44a557266f |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.