Triple
T19999874
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Jerry (The Zoo Story) |
E494288
|
entity |
| Predicate | relationshipToPeter |
P138294
|
FINISHED |
| Object | stranger who forces self-confrontation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: stranger who forces self-confrontation | Statement: [Jerry (The Zoo Story), relationshipToPeter, stranger who forces self-confrontation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: relationshipToPeter Context triple: [Jerry (The Zoo Story), relationshipToPeter, stranger who forces self-confrontation]
-
A.
relationshipToPete
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Pete.
-
B.
relationshipToTony
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has with Tony.
-
C.
relationshipToPaul
Indicates a specified type of personal or social relationship that an entity has with Paul.
-
D.
relationshipToHenry
Indicates the specific type of relationship or connection that an entity has to Henry.
-
E.
relationshipToJack
Indicates the specific type of personal or social connection an entity has with Jack.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626b2d748190886981ea90c8b2ea |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e661a15f308190a99ac3205f948acb |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e54cdddbd48190becc8b2aa5ab4ef9 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:45 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e54fc20888819083c9118a09d0d2dc |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:57 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:32 p.m.