Triple
T1999858
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | easyGroup |
E43442
|
entity |
| Predicate | ownsIntellectualProperty |
P35397
|
FINISHED |
| Object | easyJet brand |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: easyJet brand | Statement: [easyGroup, ownsIntellectualProperty, easyJet brand]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: ownsIntellectualProperty Context triple: [easyGroup, ownsIntellectualProperty, easyJet brand]
-
A.
hasPatentPortfolioIn
Indicates that an entity holds or manages one or more patents within a specified jurisdiction, region, or technical domain.
-
B.
patentIn
Indicates that one entity holds or is associated with a patent located, filed, or registered in a particular jurisdiction, organization, or context represented by the other entity.
-
C.
usedPatentPortfolioOf
Indicates that one entity made use of another entity’s patent portfolio, typically for development, production, licensing, or strategic purposes.
-
D.
ownedProperty
Indicates that one entity possesses legal ownership or control over another entity as property.
-
E.
hasProprietaryStatus
Indicates that something is owned, controlled, or protected as proprietary rather than being public or freely available.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88715dbbc8190b2299e29e955d997 |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb91055d88190a980e7b42e5895d4 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb79c97d48190b3147430ed39faa9 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:29 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69abb90ec7948190bbfb0329e9e67cca |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:35 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.