Triple
T19995998
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | French nobility |
E494193
|
entity |
| Predicate | couldBeAcquiredBy |
P138271
|
FINISHED |
| Object | inheritance |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: inheritance | Statement: [French nobility, couldBeAcquiredBy, inheritance]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: couldBeAcquiredBy Context triple: [French nobility, couldBeAcquiredBy, inheritance]
-
A.
laterAcquiredBy
Indicates that one entity was acquired by another entity at a later point in time, after some prior state or ownership.
-
B.
acquisitionAnnouncedBy
Indicates that an acquisition event was publicly announced by the specified announcing entity (such as a company or organization).
-
C.
laterAcquiredThrough
Indicates that one entity came to possess or obtain another entity at a subsequent time specifically by means of a particular acquisition method or process.
-
D.
acquiredFor
Indicates that one entity obtained or purchased another entity specifically for the benefit, use, or purpose of a third entity.
-
E.
acquisitionType
Indicates the specific kind or category of acquisition relationship that exists between entities (such as a company buying another company, assets, or a controlling stake).
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626b2d748190886981ea90c8b2ea |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65fe3fb288190a935c334e8a5d54e |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fd311881908448f2aea8b4812e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e543c42c688190a22f4d31ec692377 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:32 p.m.