Triple
T19993018
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board |
E494108
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfMisconductReviewed |
P76459
|
FINISHED |
| Object | excessive force |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: excessive force | Statement: [New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board, typeOfMisconductReviewed, excessive force]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfMisconductReviewed Context triple: [New York City Civilian Complaint Review Board, typeOfMisconductReviewed, excessive force]
-
A.
concernsTypeOfConduct
chosen
Indicates that something is about or relates specifically to a particular type or category of conduct or behavior.
-
B.
oversightType
Indicates the specific kind or category of oversight applied to an entity or activity, such as the manner or level of supervision, review, or regulatory control involved.
-
C.
subjectOfCondemnation
Indicates that one entity is the target or object of formal disapproval, criticism, or denunciation by another entity.
-
D.
typeOfCensure
Indicates the specific kind or category of censure applied in a given disciplinary or critical action.
-
E.
accusationsOfNonComplianceBy
Indicates that one party has formally alleged that another party has failed to meet required rules, standards, or obligations.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65fe2036c8190b9f313215ad44e87 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fd311881908448f2aea8b4812e |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:31 p.m.