Triple
T19991945
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem |
E494084
|
entity |
| Predicate | mainClaim |
P4932
|
FINISHED |
| Object | every non-dictatorial, deterministic, onto social choice function with at least three alternatives is manipulable |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: every non-dictatorial, deterministic, onto social choice function with at least three alternatives is manipulable | Statement: [Gibbard–Satterthwaite theorem, mainClaim, every non-dictatorial, deterministic, onto social choice function with at least three alternatives is manipulable]
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65fe10ffc81908c94168b0a8ea9c9 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:31 p.m.