Triple

T19978206
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Southwest Freeway (U.S. Route 59 / Interstate 69) E493744 entity
Predicate hasFrontageRoads P138133 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Southwest Freeway (U.S. Route 59 / Interstate 69), hasFrontageRoads, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFrontageRoads
Context triple: [Southwest Freeway (U.S. Route 59 / Interstate 69), hasFrontageRoads, yes]
  • A. hasRoads
    Indicates that there exist constructed road connections linking the related entities.
  • B. hasTypicalFrontage
    Indicates that something normally faces or fronts onto something else, such as a property having its usual frontage on a particular street or area.
  • C. hasRoadway
    Indicates that one location or area is connected to another by a road or roadway infrastructure.
  • D. streetFrontageOn
    Indicates that a property or parcel directly borders or faces a particular street along at least one of its sides.
  • E. hasSeparateAccessRoad
    Indicates that an entity is served by its own distinct access road, separate from other routes or shared entrances.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced completed April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65d11108481908241a2a96a795a7d completed April 20, 2026, 5:06 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e537fae79c81909eae39500766d0b6 completed April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69e543c42c688190a22f4d31ec692377 completed April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m.
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:27 p.m.