Triple
T19976702
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mihăiță |
E493709
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasGrammaticalAccent |
P89305
|
FINISHED |
| Object | on the syllable "-i-" |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: on the syllable "-i-" | Statement: [Mihăiță, hasGrammaticalAccent, on the syllable "-i-"]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasGrammaticalAccent Context triple: [Mihăiță, hasGrammaticalAccent, on the syllable "-i-"]
-
A.
hasAccent
Indicates that an entity speaks with or possesses a particular accent or distinctive pronunciation style.
-
B.
hasAccentPosition
chosen
Indicates the position within a word or phrase where the primary accent or stress is placed.
-
C.
accentedFormOf
Indicates that one linguistic form is an accented or diacritically marked variant of another, more basic form.
-
D.
hasAccentSystem
Indicates that an entity employs or is characterized by a particular system or pattern of accents (e.g., in language, music, or typography).
-
E.
hasCaseMarking
Indicates that a linguistic element (such as a noun or pronoun) bears a specific grammatical case marking that signals its syntactic or semantic role in a clause.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65d0f4fb48190ad63afeff3513523 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5:06 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fae79c81909eae39500766d0b6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:27 p.m.