Triple
T19974082
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | James Russo |
E493641
|
entity |
| Predicate | workDomain |
P35885
|
FINISHED |
| Object | film |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: film | Statement: [James Russo, workDomain, film]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: workDomain Context triple: [James Russo, workDomain, film]
-
A.
publicDomain
Indicates that a work or resource is not protected by intellectual property rights and is freely available for anyone to use, copy, modify, and distribute without restriction.
-
B.
partOfDomain
chosen
Indicates that one entity belongs to, is included within, or is a constituent part of the scope or domain defined by another entity.
-
C.
inputDomain
Indicates that a function, process, or system accepts inputs belonging to a specified domain or set of allowable values.
-
D.
emailAddressDomain
Indicates that one entity is the domain portion (e.g., "example.com") of another entity’s email address.
-
E.
territorialDomain
Indicates that one entity has territorial authority, control, or jurisdiction over a geographic area or domain associated with another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69da626a67648190af9653832a3aeced |
completed | April 11, 2026, 3:02 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65bcb72048190aedb4f085ace0493 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537fae79c81909eae39500766d0b6 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 11, 2026, 3:23 p.m.