Triple
T19963965
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Supreme Court of Ukraine |
E479882
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasPart |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Cassation Administrative Court |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cassation Administrative Court | Statement: [Supreme Court of Ukraine, hasPart, Cassation Administrative Court]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cassation Administrative Court Context triple: [Supreme Court of Ukraine, hasPart, Cassation Administrative Court]
-
A.
Administrative Court
The Administrative Court is a specialist court in England and Wales that primarily handles judicial reviews and other public law challenges to decisions made by public bodies.
-
B.
High Administrative Court
The High Administrative Court is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating disputes involving administrative law and public authorities.
-
C.
administrative courts of appeal
Administrative courts of appeal are intermediate-level Swedish courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, and migration before possible further appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court.
-
D.
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Verwaltungsgerichtshof is Austria’s highest court for administrative law, responsible for reviewing decisions of public authorities and lower administrative courts.
-
E.
high council for administrative courts
The high council for administrative courts is a French judicial governance body that oversees the organization, functioning, and careers of judges within the administrative courts and administrative courts of appeal.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cassation Administrative Court Target entity description: The Cassation Administrative Court is a high-level judicial body within Ukraine’s Supreme Court that reviews and resolves appeals in administrative law cases.
-
A.
Administrative Court
The Administrative Court is a specialist court in England and Wales that primarily handles judicial reviews and other public law challenges to decisions made by public bodies.
-
B.
High Administrative Court
The High Administrative Court is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating disputes involving administrative law and public authorities.
-
C.
administrative courts of appeal
Administrative courts of appeal are intermediate-level Swedish courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, and migration before possible further appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court.
-
D.
Verwaltungsgerichtshof
Verwaltungsgerichtshof is Austria’s highest court for administrative law, responsible for reviewing decisions of public authorities and lower administrative courts.
-
E.
high council for administrative courts
The high council for administrative courts is a French judicial governance body that oversees the organization, functioning, and careers of judges within the administrative courts and administrative courts of appeal.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65bc4417c8190912f3d85fd7a5a32 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 5 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.