Triple

T19963965
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Supreme Court of Ukraine E479882 entity
Predicate hasPart P35 FINISHED
Object Cassation Administrative Court NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cassation Administrative Court | Statement: [Supreme Court of Ukraine, hasPart, Cassation Administrative Court]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cassation Administrative Court
Context triple: [Supreme Court of Ukraine, hasPart, Cassation Administrative Court]
  • A. Administrative Court
    The Administrative Court is a specialist court in England and Wales that primarily handles judicial reviews and other public law challenges to decisions made by public bodies.
  • B. High Administrative Court
    The High Administrative Court is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating disputes involving administrative law and public authorities.
  • C. administrative courts of appeal
    Administrative courts of appeal are intermediate-level Swedish courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, and migration before possible further appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court.
  • D. Verwaltungsgerichtshof
    Verwaltungsgerichtshof is Austria’s highest court for administrative law, responsible for reviewing decisions of public authorities and lower administrative courts.
  • E. high council for administrative courts
    The high council for administrative courts is a French judicial governance body that oversees the organization, functioning, and careers of judges within the administrative courts and administrative courts of appeal.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Cassation Administrative Court
Target entity description: The Cassation Administrative Court is a high-level judicial body within Ukraine’s Supreme Court that reviews and resolves appeals in administrative law cases.
  • A. Administrative Court
    The Administrative Court is a specialist court in England and Wales that primarily handles judicial reviews and other public law challenges to decisions made by public bodies.
  • B. High Administrative Court
    The High Administrative Court is the highest judicial body responsible for reviewing and adjudicating disputes involving administrative law and public authorities.
  • C. administrative courts of appeal
    Administrative courts of appeal are intermediate-level Swedish courts that review decisions from administrative courts in matters such as taxation, social security, and migration before possible further appeal to the Supreme Administrative Court.
  • D. Verwaltungsgerichtshof
    Verwaltungsgerichtshof is Austria’s highest court for administrative law, responsible for reviewing decisions of public authorities and lower administrative courts.
  • E. high council for administrative courts
    The high council for administrative courts is a French judicial governance body that oversees the organization, functioning, and careers of judges within the administrative courts and administrative courts of appeal.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65bc4417c8190912f3d85fd7a5a32 completed April 20, 2026, 5 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.