Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission | Statement: [United States federal campaign finance law, shapedBy, SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission]

Target entity: SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission
Context triple: [United States federal campaign finance law, shapedBy, SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission]

• A. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
  McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
• B. Rucho v. Common Cause
  Rucho v. Common Cause is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering present political questions beyond the reach of federal courts.
• C. Davis v. Federal Election Commission
  Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.
• D. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• E. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• F. None of above. chosen
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target entity: SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission
Target entity description: SpeechNow.org v. Federal Election Commission is a 2010 U.S. Court of Appeals decision that paved the way for Super PACs by allowing independent political expenditure groups to raise unlimited contributions.

• A. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
  McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
• B. Rucho v. Common Cause
  Rucho v. Common Cause is a 2019 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that claims of partisan gerrymandering present political questions beyond the reach of federal courts.
• C. Davis v. Federal Election Commission
  Davis v. Federal Election Commission is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the “millionaire’s amendment” to federal campaign finance law as an unconstitutional burden on self-financed candidates’ First Amendment rights.
• D. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
  McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
• E. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• F. None of above. chosen