Triple

T19961540
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject United States federal campaign finance law E479824 entity
Predicate shapedBy P2454 FINISHED
Object Buckley v. Valeo — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Buckley v. Valeo | Statement: [United States federal campaign finance law, shapedBy, Buckley v. Valeo]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Buckley v. Valeo
Context triple: [United States federal campaign finance law, shapedBy, Buckley v. Valeo]
  • A. Buckley v. Valeo chosen
    Buckley v. Valeo is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reshaped campaign finance law by equating certain limits on political spending with restrictions on free speech under the First Amendment.
  • B. McConnell v. Federal Election Commission
    McConnell v. Federal Election Commission is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the constitutionality of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (McCain–Feingold Act), significantly shaping modern campaign finance law.
  • C. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission
    McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down aggregate limits on individual contributions to federal political campaigns as a violation of the First Amendment.
  • D. First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti
    First National Bank of Boston v. Bellotti is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded First Amendment protections by recognizing corporations’ rights to spend money to influence ballot initiatives.
  • E. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
    Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65af4520c81909986a47289ba801e completed April 20, 2026, 4:57 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.