Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983) | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983)]

Target entity: Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983)
Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, relatedCase, Texas v. New Mexico, 462 U.S. 554 (1983)]

• A. Texas v. New Mexico chosen
  Texas v. New Mexico is a U.S. Supreme Court interstate water rights case involving disputes over allocation and enforcement of river water compacts between the states.
• B. Bullcoming v. New Mexico
  Bullcoming v. New Mexico is a 2011 U.S. Supreme Court case that clarified the Confrontation Clause by holding that defendants have the right to cross-examine the specific analyst who prepared a forensic laboratory report used as evidence against them.
• C. California v. Texas
  California v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act after Congress reduced the individual mandate penalty to zero.
• D. Kleppe v. New Mexico
  Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
• E. United States v. Texas (1896)
  United States v. Texas (1896) was a U.S. Supreme Court case that addressed a boundary dispute involving the State of Texas and the federal government over territory along what is now the Texas–Oklahoma state line.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.