Triple

T19961414
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Texas v. New Mexico E479822 entity
Predicate involves P1256 FINISHED
Object Rio Grande Compact — NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (3 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Rio Grande Compact | Statement: [Texas v. New Mexico, involves, Rio Grande Compact]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Rio Grande Compact
Context triple: [Texas v. New Mexico, involves, Rio Grande Compact]
  • A. Colorado River Compact
    The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
  • B. Missouri River Basin Compact
    The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
  • C. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
    The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
  • D. Yellowstone River Compact
    The Yellowstone River Compact is an interstate agreement among U.S. states that allocates and manages the waters of the Yellowstone River and its tributaries within the Missouri River Basin.
  • E. Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
    The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Rio Grande Compact
Target entity description: The Rio Grande Compact is an interstate agreement among Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas that allocates the waters of the Rio Grande River and governs their use and delivery obligations.
  • A. Colorado River Compact
    The Colorado River Compact is a 1922 interstate agreement that allocates the river’s water among the seven U.S. basin states, forming the legal foundation for managing the Colorado River in the American West.
  • B. Missouri River Basin Compact
    The Missouri River Basin Compact is an interstate agreement that allocates and manages the use of water resources among the U.S. states within the Missouri River Basin.
  • C. Upper Colorado River Basin Compact
    The Upper Colorado River Basin Compact is a 1948 interstate agreement among the upper basin U.S. states that allocates and governs their shares of Colorado River water under the broader Colorado River Compact framework.
  • D. Yellowstone River Compact
    The Yellowstone River Compact is an interstate agreement among U.S. states that allocates and manages the waters of the Yellowstone River and its tributaries within the Missouri River Basin.
  • E. Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact
    The Upper Basin states of the Colorado River Compact are the U.S. states in the upper portion of the Colorado River watershed—primarily Colorado, Wyoming, Utah, and New Mexico—that share and manage the river’s water under the 1922 Colorado River Compact.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e523c19881909f9197037200dde6 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65af4520c81909986a47289ba801e completed April 20, 2026, 4:57 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:54 p.m.