Triple
T19935100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Portuguese presidential election, 2006 |
E479154
|
entity |
| Predicate | winnerRound |
P137897
|
FINISHED |
| Object | first round |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: first round | Statement: [Portuguese presidential election, 2006, winnerRound, first round]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: winnerRound Context triple: [Portuguese presidential election, 2006, winnerRound, first round]
-
A.
winnerRight
Indicates that the referenced entity is the winner on the right side or right position in a competitive or comparative context.
-
B.
winnerState
Indicates the state or condition of an entity that has achieved victory or been declared the winner in a given context.
-
C.
winnerThrows
Indicates that the entity identified as the winner performs or executes a throw action toward or involving another entity.
-
D.
winnerDam
Indicates that the subject entity is the dam (mother) of an offspring that has won a specified race or competition.
-
E.
winnerManager
Indicates that one entity is the manager or supervisor of another entity who is the winner in a given context or competition.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e522a17c819095165d4d24939fd8 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65a161a6c819084165ea528ec2f64 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:53 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537f070b481908958e0e5911dcdc1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e543c136b081909cab9394b958390a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 p.m.