Triple

T19928516
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject the Shepherd (angel of repentance) E478989 entity
Predicate perceivedStatusInText P106752 FINISHED
Object authoritative revealer LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: authoritative revealer | Statement: [the Shepherd (angel of repentance), perceivedStatusInText, authoritative revealer]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: perceivedStatusInText
Context triple: [the Shepherd (angel of repentance), perceivedStatusInText, authoritative revealer]
  • A. statusInText
    Indicates that the text explicitly states or conveys the status or condition of an entity.
  • B. textStatus
    Indicates the current state or condition of a piece of text, such as its progress, validity, or processing outcome.
  • C. statusRelativeTo
    Indicates the comparative state or condition of one entity in relation to another at a given point or over a period of time.
  • D. statusIndicates
    Indicates that a particular status value conveys or reflects the current condition, state, or situation of an entity or process.
  • E. hasStatusInText chosen
    Indicates that a particular status or state is explicitly mentioned or described within a given text.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e521855c8190b41871700afc8d6a completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e659cd4500819090363a4b7d6bf193 completed April 20, 2026, 4:52 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e537f070b481908958e0e5911dcdc1 completed April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:53 p.m.