Triple
T1989789
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Harar Jugol |
E43224
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasDefensiveFunction |
P13143
|
FINISHED |
| Object | yes |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Harar Jugol, hasDefensiveFunction, yes]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDefensiveFunction Context triple: [Harar Jugol, hasDefensiveFunction, yes]
-
A.
canBeDefendedIn
Indicates that something (such as a claim, action, or position) is capable of being justified or supported within a specified context, forum, or framework.
-
B.
hasDefenderStrength
Indicates that an entity possesses a certain level or measure of defensive capability or protective power.
-
C.
defensiveRole
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves a protective or guarding function in relation to another entity or context.
-
D.
isDefensiveStock
Indicates that a stock tends to maintain its value and perform relatively steadily during market downturns or economic uncertainty.
-
E.
defensiveTask
Indicates a task in which an entity protects, guards, or defends another entity or resource from potential threats or harm.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a88714cf2c819081644be450b8356e |
completed | March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69abb8ee02dc81908fec9fd8df7a4f40 |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:34 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69abb79ad6888190be99943a9c73cf3e |
completed | March 7, 2026, 5:28 a.m. |
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:37 p.m.