Triple

T19895753
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hammond organ E478147 entity
Predicate hasTypicalAccessory P31021 FINISHED
Object Leslie speaker LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Leslie speaker | Statement: [Hammond organ, hasTypicalAccessory, Leslie speaker]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasTypicalAccessory
Context triple: [Hammond organ, hasTypicalAccessory, Leslie speaker]
  • A. hasAccessoryType
    Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular type or category of accessory.
  • B. accessory chosen
    Indicates that one entity serves as a supplementary or supporting item to another, often enhancing its function, use, or appearance.
  • C. hasAccessoryEcosystem
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a surrounding set of compatible accessories, add-ons, or peripheral products designed to work with it.
  • D. hasTypicalAccess
    Indicates that one entity normally or customarily has the ability, permission, or means to access or use another entity.
  • E. typicallyHolds
    Indicates that a certain relationship or condition generally holds true in typical or normal situations, though not necessarily in all cases.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e520682081909892916424699bd5 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6593cb45881909cc34a9c601db001 completed April 20, 2026, 4:50 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e537ecda248190895c96afb6243823 completed April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:52 p.m.