Triple
T19889074
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Pilate’s wife |
E477980
|
entity |
| Predicate | warningContent |
P137717
|
FINISHED |
| Object | have nothing to do with that righteous man |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: have nothing to do with that righteous man | Statement: [Pilate’s wife, warningContent, have nothing to do with that righteous man]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: warningContent Context triple: [Pilate’s wife, warningContent, have nothing to do with that righteous man]
-
A.
warningType
Indicates the specific category or classification of a warning associated with an entity or event.
-
B.
warningSubject
Indicates that one entity is the topic or focus of a warning issued by another entity.
-
C.
warningIssued
Indicates that a formal warning or alert has been communicated from one entity to another regarding a potential or existing risk, problem, or violation.
-
D.
warningGivenBy
Indicates that one entity issues or delivers a warning to another entity.
-
E.
warningCall
Indicates that one entity initiates a call to another specifically to warn them about a danger, risk, or important cautionary information.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51f32b08190b3687f4f60353250 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6590c1b9c8190abbfaa04b80713b3 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:49 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537ecda248190895c96afb6243823 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69e543c136b081909cab9394b958390a |
completed | April 19, 2026, 9:06 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:52 p.m.