Triple
T19886571
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cygnus OB2 association |
E477914
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | young massive star cluster candidate |
C31364
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: young massive star cluster candidate Context triple: [Cygnus OB2 association, instanceOf, young massive star cluster candidate]
-
A.
young massive star cluster
chosen
A young massive star cluster is a dense, gravitationally bound group of thousands to millions of relatively young, high-mass stars formed together in a recent burst of star formation.
-
B.
T Tauri star candidate
A T Tauri star candidate is a young, low-mass pre-main-sequence star identified by its characteristic variability, strong emission lines, and infrared excess, suggesting it is still contracting and often surrounded by a circumstellar disk.
-
C.
massive star
A massive star is a very large, luminous star with a mass typically greater than about eight times that of the Sun, evolving rapidly and ending its life in a violent supernova or direct collapse to a black hole.
-
D.
T Tauri star
A T Tauri star is a young, low-mass, pre–main-sequence star still contracting and often surrounded by a protoplanetary disk, exhibiting strong variability and stellar winds.
-
E.
high-mass X-ray binary candidate
A high-mass X-ray binary candidate is a system suspected to consist of a compact object, such as a neutron star or black hole, accreting matter from a massive companion star and emitting strong X-rays, but lacking definitive observational confirmation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51f32b08190b3687f4f60353250 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:52 p.m.