Triple
T19884235
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | George Archer-Shee |
E477854
|
entity |
| Predicate | participantIn |
P149
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Archer-Shee v. The King |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Archer-Shee v. The King | Statement: [George Archer-Shee, participantIn, Archer-Shee v. The King]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Archer-Shee v. The King Context triple: [George Archer-Shee, participantIn, Archer-Shee v. The King]
-
A.
Archer-Shee case
chosen
The Archer-Shee case was a famous early 20th-century British legal scandal involving the wrongful accusation of a naval cadet, which became a landmark example of the fight for individual justice against institutional authority.
-
B.
Guerin v. The Queen
Guerin v. The Queen is a landmark 1984 Supreme Court of Canada decision that established the federal government’s fiduciary duty toward Indigenous peoples in its management of reserve lands.
-
C.
X v. Rex
X v. Rex is a classic detective novel by Philip MacDonald featuring a tense murder investigation and intricate courtroom drama.
-
D.
R. v. Van der Peet
R. v. Van der Peet is a landmark 1996 Supreme Court of Canada decision that defined the test for recognizing and affirming Aboriginal rights under section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982.
-
E.
R. v. Badger
R. v. Badger is a landmark Supreme Court of Canada decision that clarified the scope and interpretation of Indigenous treaty rights to hunt under Canadian law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51f32b08190b3687f4f60353250 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6590870908190a18b545f0ff0ccd6 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:49 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:52 p.m.