Triple
T19882996
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Renunciation Act 1783 |
E477825
|
entity |
| Predicate | follows |
P134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Declaratory Act 1720 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (3 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Declaratory Act 1720 | Statement: [Renunciation Act 1783, follows, Declaratory Act 1720]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Declaratory Act 1720 Context triple: [Renunciation Act 1783, follows, Declaratory Act 1720]
-
A.
Declaratory Act 1766
The Declaratory Act of 1766 was a British law asserting Parliament’s full authority to make binding laws for the American colonies “in all cases whatsoever,” passed alongside the repeal of the Stamp Act and heightening colonial tensions that led toward the American Revolution.
-
B.
Currency Act of 1764
The Currency Act of 1764 was a British law that restricted the American colonies’ ability to issue paper money, contributing to colonial economic hardship and growing resentment toward British rule.
-
C.
Indemnity Act of 1767
The Indemnity Act of 1767 was a British law passed alongside the Townshend Acts that reduced duties on imported tea to support the East India Company while still asserting Parliament’s right to tax the American colonies.
-
D.
Scott Act
The Scott Act was an 1888 U.S. federal law that drastically tightened Chinese exclusion by prohibiting Chinese laborers who had left the United States from reentering, even if they previously held valid return certificates.
-
E.
Act of Parliament 1782
The Act of Parliament 1782 was a British law that helped restore certain rights and cultural practices in the Scottish Highlands by rolling back earlier punitive legislation.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NED2
Entity disambiguation (via description)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Declaratory Act 1720 Target entity description: The Declaratory Act 1720 was a British law asserting Parliament’s right to legislate for and bind the Kingdom of Ireland in all cases, reinforcing imperial control over Irish affairs.
-
A.
Declaratory Act 1766
The Declaratory Act of 1766 was a British law asserting Parliament’s full authority to make binding laws for the American colonies “in all cases whatsoever,” passed alongside the repeal of the Stamp Act and heightening colonial tensions that led toward the American Revolution.
-
B.
Currency Act of 1764
The Currency Act of 1764 was a British law that restricted the American colonies’ ability to issue paper money, contributing to colonial economic hardship and growing resentment toward British rule.
-
C.
Indemnity Act of 1767
The Indemnity Act of 1767 was a British law passed alongside the Townshend Acts that reduced duties on imported tea to support the East India Company while still asserting Parliament’s right to tax the American colonies.
-
D.
Scott Act
The Scott Act was an 1888 U.S. federal law that drastically tightened Chinese exclusion by prohibiting Chinese laborers who had left the United States from reentering, even if they previously held valid return certificates.
-
E.
Act of Parliament 1782
The Act of Parliament 1782 was a British law that helped restore certain rights and cultural practices in the Scottish Highlands by rolling back earlier punitive legislation.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51f32b08190b3687f4f60353250 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e658e0ccc88190b6f093035cd6f2a1 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:48 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:52 p.m.