Triple
T19864104
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Arich Anpin |
E477341
|
entity |
| Predicate | isConceivedAs |
P534
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Supernal divine persona |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Supernal divine persona | Statement: [Arich Anpin, isConceivedAs, Supernal divine persona]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isConceivedAs Context triple: [Arich Anpin, isConceivedAs, Supernal divine persona]
-
A.
isDesignedAs
Indicates that something has been intentionally created or configured to serve as or function in the role of something else.
-
B.
conceptualizedFor
Indicates that one entity has been conceived, designed, or mentally framed specifically for use, application, or relevance to another entity.
-
C.
isConceptual
Indicates that something exists as an abstract or theoretical idea rather than as a concrete, physical entity.
-
D.
conceptualizedBy
Indicates that something exists as an idea, model, or concept that was formed or defined by a particular agent.
-
E.
envisionedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity is mentally pictured, imagined, or conceived in terms of another entity or role.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51e7d948190aedbcd6c30361c39 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6589d55a88190af7d4e12c4b07739 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:47 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537e21d2881909b1be82f02b99d40 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:51 p.m.