Triple
T19847084
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Athabasca Basin |
E476893
|
entity |
| Predicate | mineralCommodity |
P76326
|
FINISHED |
| Object | uranium |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: uranium | Statement: [Athabasca Basin, mineralCommodity, uranium]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: mineralCommodity Context triple: [Athabasca Basin, mineralCommodity, uranium]
-
A.
typeOfMineralProduced
Indicates that a specified mineral is produced or extracted as a result of a particular process, operation, or source.
-
B.
isMineralRich
Indicates that a location or substance contains a high concentration or abundance of minerals.
-
C.
hasImportantMineral
Indicates that an entity contains or is associated with a mineral considered significant or valuable in a given context.
-
D.
economicGeology
Indicates a relationship where geological features, materials, or processes are studied or evaluated in terms of their economic value, such as for resource exploration, extraction, or utilization.
-
E.
commodityProduced
chosen
Indicates that a particular commodity is generated, manufactured, or otherwise produced by a specified entity or process.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51d39d081909bcfafeaaf3d2fcc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65809da2c8190bb579ef42513b74d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537e21d2881909b1be82f02b99d40 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:51 p.m.