Triple
T19843286
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | NGC 4945 |
E476789
|
entity |
| Predicate | dustObscuration |
P57005
|
FINISHED |
| Object | strong in optical band |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: strong in optical band | Statement: [NGC 4945, dustObscuration, strong in optical band]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dustObscuration Context triple: [NGC 4945, dustObscuration, strong in optical band]
-
A.
hasDustExtinction
chosen
Indicates that an entity exhibits or is subject to attenuation of light due to the presence of intervening dust.
-
B.
dustFormationObserved
Indicates that the process of dust formation has been detected or recorded as occurring.
-
C.
dustComposition
Indicates the material makeup or constituent substances that form a given dust sample or dust population.
-
D.
debrisDiskDustContent
Indicates the amount or characteristics of dust present within a debris disk surrounding an astronomical object.
-
E.
hasExtendedDustyRegion
Indicates that an entity possesses a surrounding area or zone characterized by dust that extends outward beyond its immediate vicinity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51d39d081909bcfafeaaf3d2fcc |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65806ea888190850421154238d91c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:44 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e537e21d2881909b1be82f02b99d40 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 8:15 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:51 p.m.