Triple
T19827676
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Municipality of Bogatić |
E476369
|
entity |
| Predicate | containsSettlement |
P847
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Crna Bara |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Crna Bara | Statement: [Municipality of Bogatić, containsSettlement, Crna Bara]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Crna Bara Context triple: [Municipality of Bogatić, containsSettlement, Crna Bara]
-
A.
Crna Bara
chosen
Crna Bara is a village in western Serbia, known as one of the settlements within the Mačva region near the town of Bogatić.
-
B.
Crna Trava
Crna Trava is a small mountainous municipality in southeastern Serbia, historically known for its skilled builders and significant emigration.
-
C.
Crvenka
Crvenka is a small town in the Vojvodina region of northern Serbia, known historically for its food industry and sugar refinery.
-
D.
Baška
Baška is a popular coastal town and tourist resort on the island of Krk in Croatia, known for its long pebble beach and historic old town.
-
E.
Stara Crna Gora
Stara Crna Gora is the historical core region of Montenegro, encompassing the original tribal heartland from which the Montenegrin state gradually expanded.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51c7c188190b926f3a2a7b5f881 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e656cc0f2c81908137caa4c2087027 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:39 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:50 p.m.