Triple
T19826621
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | canton of Domont |
E476340
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalDefinitionDocument |
P23668
|
FINISHED |
| Object | French decree on delimitation of cantons in Val-d'Oise (2014) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French decree on delimitation of cantons in Val-d'Oise (2014) | Statement: [canton of Domont, legalDefinitionDocument, French decree on delimitation of cantons in Val-d'Oise (2014)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalDefinitionDocument Context triple: [canton of Domont, legalDefinitionDocument, French decree on delimitation of cantons in Val-d'Oise (2014)]
-
A.
legalTermIn
Indicates that a particular legal term or concept is used, defined, or applicable within a specified legal document, jurisdiction, or context.
-
B.
legalDefinitionSource
chosen
Indicates the source (such as a statute, regulation, or case) from which a particular legal definition is derived.
-
C.
legalContent
Indicates that the associated material complies with applicable laws and regulations and is permitted for use, distribution, or display.
-
D.
legalConcept
Indicates a relationship where something is classified or treated as a concept defined and governed by law or legal theory.
-
E.
legalSignificance
Indicates that something has recognized importance, effect, or consequence within a legal context or system.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51c7c188190b926f3a2a7b5f881 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e656cb20788190b9deac6b8af6a55d |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:39 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5305bda388190a23b7191768107b1 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:50 p.m.