Triple

T19824153
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Japanese battleship Tosa E476274 entity
Predicate designedArmorBeltThickness P38465 FINISHED
Object up to about 280 mm LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: up to about 280 mm | Statement: [Japanese battleship Tosa, designedArmorBeltThickness, up to about 280 mm]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: designedArmorBeltThickness
Context triple: [Japanese battleship Tosa, designedArmorBeltThickness, up to about 280 mm]
  • A. armoredBeltThickness chosen
    Indicates the thickness of an entity’s protective armored belt in the context of its defensive structure or design.
  • B. armourBelt
    Indicates a relationship where an armour belt is equipped on, attached to, or associated with an entity (such as a character, vehicle, or structure) as protective gear.
  • C. sideArmorThickness
    Indicates the thickness of an object's armor specifically along its sides.
  • D. deckArmorThickness
    Indicates the thickness of the armor plating on the horizontal deck surface of a vehicle, vessel, or structure.
  • E. armourThickness
    Indicates the measured thickness of an entity’s protective armor in the context of defense or shielding.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51c7c188190b926f3a2a7b5f881 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e655017c188190ae9e17ae6b0eee05 completed April 20, 2026, 4:32 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5305bda388190a23b7191768107b1 completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:50 p.m.