Triple
T19822783
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Scottsboro Boys trials |
E476238
|
entity |
| Predicate | relatedCase |
P3137
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Norris v. Alabama |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Norris v. Alabama | Statement: [Scottsboro Boys trials, relatedCase, Norris v. Alabama]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Norris v. Alabama Context triple: [Scottsboro Boys trials, relatedCase, Norris v. Alabama]
-
A.
U.S. Supreme Court case Norris v. Alabama
chosen
Norris v. Alabama is a landmark 1935 U.S. Supreme Court decision arising from the Scottsboro cases that held the systematic exclusion of Black citizens from juries unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
B.
Swain v. Alabama
Swain v. Alabama was a 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision that set a high evidentiary bar for proving racial discrimination in jury selection, later overturned by Batson v. Kentucky.
-
C.
Powell v. Alabama
Powell v. Alabama is a landmark 1932 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held in capital cases the Due Process Clause requires defendants be given access to effective legal counsel, especially when they are young, illiterate, or otherwise disadvantaged.
-
D.
Marsh v. Alabama
Marsh v. Alabama is a 1946 U.S. Supreme Court case holding that a privately owned company town could not prohibit the distribution of religious literature on its sidewalks because they functioned like public streets under the First Amendment.
-
E.
Patterson v. Alabama
Patterson v. Alabama is a 1935 U.S. Supreme Court case arising from the Scottsboro Boys prosecutions that addressed racial discrimination and due process violations in the criminal justice system.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51c7c188190b926f3a2a7b5f881 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e654ffb37c8190be540a793befe16c |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:31 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:50 p.m.