Triple
T19801992
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | C. Lee Buxton |
E475702
|
entity |
| Predicate | significantCourtDecisionInvolvingSubject |
P41134
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut | Statement: [C. Lee Buxton, significantCourtDecisionInvolvingSubject, 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: significantCourtDecisionInvolvingSubject Context triple: [C. Lee Buxton, significantCourtDecisionInvolvingSubject, 1965 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Griswold v. Connecticut]
-
A.
influencedCourtDecision
Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
-
B.
judgmentInvolves
chosen
Indicates that a particular judgment, decision, or legal ruling includes, concerns, or pertains to a specified entity or matter.
-
C.
decisionCourt
Indicates that a particular court rendered the decision or judgment in a given legal case or proceeding.
-
D.
legalCaseHeParticipatedInDecidedBy
Indicates that a legal case in which he participated was decided or adjudicated by a specified authority or court.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51bc4208190a1c57d8c5d1b15e4 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e654257cb4819096fb2aa5d1f7fbb0 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:28 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5305858108190bbbfdb9ba3ab9f80 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.