Triple
T19786823
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Act of Mediation |
E475290
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesPoliticalStatusOf |
P71945
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Canton of St. Gallen |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Canton of St. Gallen | Statement: [Act of Mediation, definesPoliticalStatusOf, Canton of St. Gallen]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesPoliticalStatusOf Context triple: [Act of Mediation, definesPoliticalStatusOf, Canton of St. Gallen]
-
A.
isPoliticalStatus
chosen
Indicates that a relationship specifies the political condition, classification, or standing associated with an entity.
-
B.
politicalStatusContext
Indicates the situational or contextual conditions under which a particular political status holds or is evaluated.
-
C.
politicalStatusRepresented
Indicates that an entity’s political status is expressed, symbolized, or officially represented by another entity.
-
D.
supportedPoliticalStatus
Indicates that one entity endorsed, favored, or advocated for a particular political status or position of another entity.
-
E.
politicalStatusBefore
Indicates the political status or condition an entity held prior to a specified event, change, or reference point.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51b014081908b263e167370529a |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e65389145881909385f36f56cd250b |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:25 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e53053ed2881908400becdfada7fd3 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.