Triple

T19783337
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Samuel Pinsker E475193 entity
Predicate familyName P18 FINISHED
Object Pinsker NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pinsker | Statement: [Samuel Pinsker, familyName, Pinsker]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pinsker
Context triple: [Samuel Pinsker, familyName, Pinsker]
  • A. Pinsker chosen
    Pinsker is a Jewish surname most notably associated with Leo Pinsker, a 19th-century physician and early Zionist activist.
  • B. Pincus
    Pincus is a surname most notably associated with Lionel Pincus, an influential American financier and co-founder of the private equity firm Warburg Pincus.
  • C. Bonger
    Bonger is a Dutch surname most notably associated with Johanna van Gogh-Bonger, the key figure in preserving and promoting Vincent van Gogh’s artistic legacy.
  • D. Pinzberg
    Pinzberg is a small municipality in the Upper Franconian region of Bavaria, Germany.
  • E. Eisele
    Eisele is a surname most notably associated with Donn F. Eisele, an American astronaut who flew on the Apollo 7 mission.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51b014081908b263e167370529a completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e65385ee8081908d58cc3ff05b9b23 completed April 20, 2026, 4:25 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:49 p.m.