Triple
T19765134
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Apatlaco |
E474733
|
entity |
| Predicate | nameEtymologyMeaning |
P28204
|
FINISHED |
| Object | place of the water canal |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: place of the water canal | Statement: [Apatlaco, nameEtymologyMeaning, place of the water canal]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: nameEtymologyMeaning Context triple: [Apatlaco, nameEtymologyMeaning, place of the water canal]
-
A.
nameEtymologyFor
Indicates that one entity expresses or explains the origin or derivation of the name of another entity.
-
B.
possibleNameEtymology
Indicates a hypothesized or suggested origin or derivation of an entity’s name from another term, source, or linguistic root.
-
C.
birthNameMeaning
Indicates the semantic meaning or significance associated with a person's birth name.
-
D.
currentNameMeaning
chosen
Indicates that the predicate expresses the meaning or significance of an entity’s current name.
-
E.
nameMeaningCertainty
Indicates how certain or confident a source is about the correctness or validity of an entity’s name meaning.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51a43a08190956bc6df13c91a77 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e653226af081909992ff5568bb54a5 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:24 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5305016e08190b9561a96baecb0b8 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.