Triple
T19759907
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Avery v. Midland County |
E474598
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasStateLawContext |
P10245
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Texas local government structure |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Texas local government structure | Statement: [Avery v. Midland County, hasStateLawContext, Texas local government structure]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasStateLawContext Context triple: [Avery v. Midland County, hasStateLawContext, Texas local government structure]
-
A.
stateLawAppliesFrom
Indicates that a particular state law becomes applicable starting from a specified point in time or under certain conditions.
-
B.
hasStateCourt
Indicates that a given jurisdiction or region possesses an official court that operates at the state level.
-
C.
stateLawAtIssue
chosen
Indicates that a particular state law is the subject of dispute, analysis, or determination in a given legal context or case.
-
D.
stateLawRepresentedBy
Indicates that a particular state law is formally represented or advocated by a specified legal document, body, or representative entity.
-
E.
hasSecondaryStateJurisdictionContext
Indicates that an entity is associated with a secondary jurisdictional context defined by a specific state or state-level authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51940a0819087bd2996f98da668 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6531e79fc819094a9f88182e90dab |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69e5305016e08190b9561a96baecb0b8 |
completed | April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.