Triple
T19759876
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Avery v. Midland County |
E474598
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasFullCitation |
P17212
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968) |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968) | Statement: [Avery v. Midland County, hasFullCitation, Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968)]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968) Context triple: [Avery v. Midland County, hasFullCitation, Avery v. Midland County, 390 U.S. 474 (1968)]
-
A.
Avery v. Midland County
chosen
Avery v. Midland County is a 1968 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the "one person, one vote" principle to local government districts, requiring that they be apportioned on a population basis.
-
B.
Regan v. Wald
Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
-
C.
Craig v. Boren
Craig v. Boren is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that established intermediate scrutiny as the standard for evaluating gender-based classifications under the Equal Protection Clause.
-
D.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
E.
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961)
Monroe v. Pape, 365 U.S. 167 (1961), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision that broadly expanded the scope of civil rights lawsuits against state and local officials under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, allowing individuals to sue for constitutional violations even when the officials’ actions were unauthorized by state law.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e51940a0819087bd2996f98da668 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6531e79fc819094a9f88182e90dab |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:23 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.