Triple

T19755081
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Anathem E474480 entity
Predicate containsMathematicalConcepts P127034 FINISHED
Object geometry LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: geometry | Statement: [Anathem, containsMathematicalConcepts, geometry]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: containsMathematicalConcepts
Context triple: [Anathem, containsMathematicalConcepts, geometry]
  • A. mathematicallyUses
    Indicates that one entity employs or applies another entity within a mathematical context, such as in a formula, proof, computation, or theoretical framework.
  • B. hasMathematicalDiscipline chosen
    Indicates that one entity is associated with or characterized by a particular branch or field of mathematics.
  • C. hasMathematicalProperty
    Indicates that one entity possesses or exhibits a specific mathematical property or characteristic.
  • D. mathematicalLevel
    Indicates the degree or complexity of mathematical knowledge, skill, or sophistication associated with an entity.
  • E. supportsMathematicsTopic
    Indicates that one entity provides assistance, resources, or reinforcement for understanding or working with a particular mathematics topic.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e51940a0819087bd2996f98da668 completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6529dada081909c5b4d65247c6032 completed April 20, 2026, 4:21 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69e5305016e08190b9561a96baecb0b8 completed April 19, 2026, 7:43 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:48 p.m.