Triple

T1974955
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Żegota E42887 entity
Predicate hasEthicalStance P4934 FINISHED
Object opposition to antisemitism LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: opposition to antisemitism | Statement: [Żegota, hasEthicalStance, opposition to antisemitism]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasEthicalStance
Context triple: [Żegota, hasEthicalStance, opposition to antisemitism]
  • A. hasEthicalDimension
    Indicates that the relationship, action, or situation involves moral considerations, value judgments, or ethical implications.
  • B. hasEthicalRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a position, function, or responsibility defined in terms of ethical duties, norms, or moral obligations in relation to another entity or context.
  • C. hasEthicalAssessment
    Indicates that an entity has been evaluated according to ethical criteria or standards.
  • D. hasMoralPerspective
    Indicates that an entity holds or applies a particular moral or ethical viewpoint in evaluating actions, situations, or other entities.
  • E. positionOnEthics chosen
    Indicates a stance, viewpoint, or opinion that an entity holds regarding ethical principles, issues, or practices.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a8871289048190b00b0d7744b7b2b1 completed March 4, 2026, 7:25 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abb3f835108190b0709ccf3a487a96 completed March 7, 2026, 5:13 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69abaff9a09c8190a81fa13f4b85bc79 completed March 7, 2026, 4:56 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:36 p.m.