Triple

T19740756
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Tanoan languages E474109 entity
Predicate languageFamilyOf P35117 FINISHED
Object Tiwa languages NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Tiwa languages | Statement: [Tanoan languages, languageFamilyOf, Tiwa languages]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Tiwa languages
Context triple: [Tanoan languages, languageFamilyOf, Tiwa languages]
  • A. Tiwa languages chosen
    The Tiwa languages are a group of closely related Tanoan languages spoken by Tiwa Pueblo peoples in parts of New Mexico and Texas.
  • B. Tiwa language
    Tiwa language is a Tibeto-Burman language spoken by the Tiwa (Lalung) people of northeastern India, primarily in Assam and Meghalaya.
  • C. Wati languages
    Wati languages are a subgroup of Australian Aboriginal Pama–Nyungan languages spoken traditionally across parts of central and western Australia.
  • D. Tebu languages
    The Tebu languages are a group of closely related Saharan languages spoken primarily by the Tebu people across parts of Chad, Niger, and Libya.
  • E. Tagbanwa languages
    Tagbanwa languages are a group of closely related Austronesian languages spoken by the Tagbanwa people of Palawan in the Philippines, known for their association with one of the country’s indigenous scripts.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (2 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d8e517ebd48190979ee76723bcfadf completed April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e6516159c8819090022094aa91902b completed April 20, 2026, 4:16 p.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:47 p.m.