Triple
T19739868
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Clay County, Minnesota |
E474085
|
entity |
| Predicate | contains |
P35
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Dilworth, Minnesota |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Dilworth, Minnesota | Statement: [Clay County, Minnesota, contains, Dilworth, Minnesota]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Dilworth, Minnesota Context triple: [Clay County, Minnesota, contains, Dilworth, Minnesota]
-
A.
Dilworth, Minnesota
chosen
Dilworth, Minnesota is a small city in Clay County that functions as a close-knit residential community and suburb directly east of Moorhead in the Fargo–Moorhead metropolitan area.
-
B.
Dundas, Minnesota
Dundas, Minnesota is a small city in southeastern Minnesota known historically for its milling industry and its location along the Cannon River.
-
C.
Ellsworth, Minnesota
Ellsworth, Minnesota is a small rural city in southwestern Minnesota known for its agricultural community and close-knit small-town character.
-
D.
Dunnell, Minnesota
Dunnell, Minnesota is a small rural city located in southern Minnesota within Martin County.
-
E.
Eitzen, Minnesota
Eitzen, Minnesota is a small city located in southeastern Minnesota near the Iowa border.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e517ebd48190979ee76723bcfadf |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e651607e388190bbb2aaed252820fe |
completed | April 20, 2026, 4:16 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:47 p.m.