Triple
T19721279
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nityananda |
E473614
|
entity |
| Predicate | associatedWith |
P37
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Pancha Tattva |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Pancha Tattva | Statement: [Nityananda, associatedWith, Pancha Tattva]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Pancha Tattva Context triple: [Nityananda, associatedWith, Pancha Tattva]
-
A.
Pancha Tattva
chosen
Pancha Tattva refers to the five divine aspects or manifestations of Lord Chaitanya in Gaudiya Vaishnavism, collectively representing the complete truth of God and His energies.
-
B.
Tattva Samkhyana
Tattva Samkhyana is a key philosophical treatise in the Dvaita Vedanta tradition that systematically outlines its dualistic metaphysics and theology.
-
C.
Tattva Prakasika
Tattva Prakasika is a traditional philosophical commentary in the Dvaita Vedanta school that elaborates and clarifies key metaphysical doctrines.
-
D.
Tattva-kaumudī
Tattva-kaumudī is a renowned Sanskrit commentary on the Sāṃkhyakārikā that systematically expounds and clarifies the classical Sāṃkhya philosophical system.
-
E.
Tattvacintāmaṇi
Tattvacintāmaṇi is a foundational work of Indian logic and epistemology that systematizes the Navya-Nyāya school’s analysis of knowledge and inference.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e516dd048190a0b6c93ea3e71f58 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e649f483c481908c6b3114bf9c5934 |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:44 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.