Triple
T19714587
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Hanworth |
E473440
|
entity |
| Predicate | electoralWard |
P16735
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Hanworth Park Ward |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hanworth Park Ward | Statement: [Hanworth, electoralWard, Hanworth Park Ward]
NED1
Entity disambiguation (via context triple)
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hanworth Park Ward Context triple: [Hanworth, electoralWard, Hanworth Park Ward]
-
A.
Woodhouse Park ward
Woodhouse Park ward is an electoral division within the city of Manchester, England, represented on the local council and used for administrative and political purposes.
-
B.
Hanworth Ward
chosen
Hanworth Ward is a local government electoral division in the London Borough of Hounslow, representing the Hanworth area on the borough council.
-
C.
Warren Park ward
Warren Park ward is a local electoral division within the borough of Havant in Hampshire, England.
-
D.
Haverstock ward
Haverstock ward is an electoral division within the London Borough of Camden, forming part of the parliamentary constituency of Holborn and St Pancras.
-
E.
Dunvant ward
Dunvant ward is an electoral division and suburban area within the City and County of Swansea in south Wales.
- F. None of above.
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Provenance (2 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69d8e516dd048190a0b6c93ea3e71f58 |
completed | April 10, 2026, 11:55 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69e6440b47508190a8a33325b00841dc |
completed | April 20, 2026, 3:19 p.m. |
Created at: April 10, 2026, 1:46 p.m.